January 23, 2006

Constructive Dismissal -- Advice for Employees

Q: I have been reading about constructive dismissal on the internet. I am convinced that my job has been changed significantly in the last several months. Do I just walk out, and say I’ve been constructively dismissed?

A: No!

Although you don’t say how long you’ve worked for your employer, constructive dismissal is a high-risk alternative. The onus is squarely upon you to prove, on the basis of objective evidence, that your employer has unilaterally and fundamentally changed the existing terms and conditions of your employment relationship. While that may be the case, there may be other avenues worth exploring before taking the “plunge”, accepting that significant onus, walking out and claiming constructive dismissal.

Typically, the employer’s “knee jerk” reaction to someone in your circumstances walking out and claiming constructive dismissal is to take the counter position that you have, in effect, quit, and thereby disentitled yourself to any compensation.

While the internet can be a good source of basic legal information, often a little bit of knowledge can be a dangerous thing (as the saying goes). Be careful, you are playing with your career and, perhaps, significant economic entitlements. Get good, solid advice, and get it soon.

My boss is a bully - workopolis.com.

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Q: A friend of mine has been working at his job for the last 10 years and this weekend his boss called a meeting with staff and a "consultant"... The boss has decided to change pay structure and is now paying everyone minimum wage plus commission on "billable sales"... this is not a sales position job. This job is a technician job, programming phones/ installation etc. The jobs which are covered by warrenty (about 90%) are not considered billable sales. My friends pay has now been reduced by about 50% (if you don't include the commission). I can't see this as being a legal move on the employers part. When the commission was questioned the response was that perhaps the technicians would now be more active in seeking out new billable sales. So, it is inferred that they are now salesmen on top of their regular duties as technicians. Also, with a small staff of about 13 it will bring about an environment of dog eat dog to get the billable hours. Is this grounds for "constructive dismissal"?

thanks,
patti

5/26/2006 09:38:00 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home